Space: 1999

Marco Palombi

Mar 15, 2016 — 1 min read

As a kid, Space: 1999 inspired me - and sometimes scared me.

Back in the days, I watched as many episodes as possible, religiously waiting for the next episode to be aired.

I don`t recall watching the first episode. I have now, thanks to the Internet.

Here is what I noticed:

the first season was aired in 1975
it was a co-production of the British ITC and the Italian RAI and this might explain why it was aired in Italy
as a teenager my US friends had never heard of it, now I know why (1)
the moon was shot off orbit by the explosion of the nuclear waste stored there from earth
handheld communicators were small, black and white, TV like screens that also acted as remote controls
lunar gravity seemed to be valid only outside the base, inside the base it was earth like gravity
I watch it in English now. I don`t think I spoke one single English word then

(1) unreal that back then I could not Google for it and show it to my US friends.

A much needed update

The truth is, I've been busy with a significant breakthrough: the first implementation of a Geneosophic expression. Specifically, I've been working on the conceptual expression of a neuron, which can be verified in the third person and executed on a computer.

What is Life?

This article suggests that the scientific community is far from reaching a consensus. While I concur with the premise that our current paradigm falls short in answering this question, I part ways with the view that we are at the beginning of our journey. In fact, we have developed Geneosophy,

A new conceptual dimension

Today, I was having a conversation with one of the individuals I collaborate with on Geneosophy. As is often the case, I asked him if we haven't collectively lost our minds with Geneosophy. This question arises because when you delve into Geneosophic comprehension, you enter a realm where

The Curse of Meaning in ChatGPT

This is an unusually long post, but also quite interesting in my humble opinion. Given the extraordinary success of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, how should their capabilities be evaluated? Will LLMs eventually replace humans in their jobs, or will they primarily serve as productivity tools, similar to

Read more

A much needed update

What is Life?

A new conceptual dimension

The Curse of Meaning in ChatGPT