Taking a step backward to move forward
Plato had a strong intuition, but he did not turn it into a rational way to define concepts. Aristotle settled for a way to describe objects. Geneosophy deals with concepts.
Read more
Why Computation Can't Solve Meaning (And What It Means for LLMs): the Quest for an (Im)possible Theory
We are living a grand illusion. As we watch Large Language Models (LLMs) draft essays, write functional code, and converse with poetic nuance, we operate under a quiet, dangerous assumption: that if we just stack enough parameters, compute cycles, and training text high enough, true understanding and intent will eventually
"I Am" vs. "I Have": How Everyday Grammar Secretly Influences the AI Debate
When you say "I am cold," you aren't just describing your temperature. You are picking a side in a centuries-old philosophical war, one that perfectly explains why the tech world is currently tearing itself apart over whether AI can truly "reason." There is
The Reverse Turing Test: What AI Tells Us About Human Intelligence
Is AI becoming more human, or are we discovering just how much of our "intelligence" is actually uncritical reflexive thought? In this dialogue, a skeptical look at our new "LLM Oracles" reveals an unsettling truth: for most of us, the Turing Test has been inverted. We
When the Question Itself Was the Problem
Most philosophical debates don't need better answers. They need a different starting point. This dialogue explores Geneosophy, a framework in which centuries-old paradoxes about mind and body, mathematics and reality, don't get solved. They stop arising. [Part 1] | [Part 2] | [Part 3] | [Part 4] | [Part